Public Safety That Works in Every Neighborhood
A call for help should be taken seriously no matter what neighborhood it comes from. At the same time, we should be thoughtful about what deputies do between emergency calls. Some locations need focused attention because of recurring serious crime. Other neighborhoods need help with traffic, lighting, theft prevention, or a problem that keeps coming back. I want the city to work with the Sheriff's Department on both, and to show residents whether the approach is working.
Start with the services we already pay for
Laguna Hills contracts with the Orange County Sheriff's Department for police services. The FY 2026–27 contract, approved by the county in June 2026, is approximately $12.1 million. That makes it the city's largest single expense, at roughly 42% of the General Fund's adopted FY 2026–27 operating spending. When a contract consumes that much of the budget, good oversight is part of supporting law enforcement.
We should keep emergency response a priority throughout the city and publish response-time data that can show where service needs improvement. Arrival times vary with urgency, staffing, location, and simultaneous emergencies, so no elected official can guarantee identical times on every call. We can demand a consistent standard and an honest explanation of results.
Put proactive attention where it will help most
Research supports carefully targeted police work at places with repeated crime, in addition to general patrol. Studies of problem-oriented policing also find meaningful reductions in crime and disorder, although outcomes vary considerably among programs. Those findings are a reason to test a focused approach here, without promising a specific percentage drop.
I would ask the Sheriff's Department to identify a small number of recurring, high-harm problems, such as a location with repeated robberies, break-ins, or serious assaults, and to describe a plan for each. What is happening? What is causing it? Which enforcement, prevention, property-management, or environmental changes might help? When will we check the outcome?
This should be done with the deputies and crime-prevention resources available under our contract. Any proposed change in staffing or assignments should come to the council for a cost-and-service review.
A quiet neighborhood can still need help
Residents often have concerns that fall short of a major crime. They may be worried about suspicious activity, an unsafe walk home, poor lighting, or repeated nuisance problems. Our crime prevention specialist and deputies can help with practical prevention, Neighborhood Watch, and referrals to the right city or county service.
Research associates fear of crime more with visible disorder than with personal experience as a victim. A Police Foundation study in Newark suggests it eases when patrols are visible and predictable and residents regularly hear what is being done. Better street lighting has also been shown to reduce crime.
These neighborhoods should still see police presence and have a clear way to report changing conditions. If conditions in a neighborhood change, so does the deployment. Crime counts are useful, and so are other measures of whether people feel safe or can get help.
Measure what we're getting
I would support a quarterly public safety update with response-time trends, serious-crime trends, progress on recurring problems, and understandable citywide spending figures. Where neighborhood-level data can be reported responsibly, we should include it, without identifying victims, compromising an investigation, or creating misleading comparisons from very small numbers.
I also want the council to review each major policing technology on cost, demonstrable benefit, privacy, and the alternatives. That review is why I oppose renewing Laguna Hills' Flock camera contract, and I will vote against renewing or expanding it. The U.S. Department of Justice's CrimeSolutions program rates license-plate recognition as ineffective at deterring crime, based on randomized trials. Research on its value to investigations is mixed. The city spends $115,000 a year on the system, and I believe that money does more as deputy time and proven prevention work. For any surveillance technology the city considers, I will require strict guardrails, public data practices, and a warrant requirement before anyone can search resident data. (See my Flock cameras position.)
My commitments as your District 4 representative
- Consistent emergency-response priorities, backed by useful public reporting and an honest acknowledgment that no one can promise the same result on every individual call.
- Focused plans for recurring serious-crime problems, developed with the Sheriff's Department and evaluated against clear goals.
- Visible prevention work across neighborhoods, including practical help with lighting, safety concerns, and Neighborhood Watch, with deployment adjusted when conditions change.
- Regular reviews of the sheriff's contract and safety technology, including cost, measurable results, and privacy protections, and a vote against renewing or expanding the Flock camera contract.
What's happening in your neighborhood?
If you have a recurring safety concern, tell me where it happens and what you've noticed. Residents should be part of identifying problems early.
Email TiffanySources
- Orange County Board of Supervisors, staff report on the Laguna Hills law enforcement services agreement, FY 2026-27 (June 23, 2026)
- City of Laguna Hills, 2025–27 Adopted Biennial Budget
- Braga, Turchan, Papachristos & Hureau, "Hot spots policing and crime reduction: an update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis" (2019)
- Hinkle, Weisburd, Telep & Petersen, "Problem-oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews (2020)
- City of Laguna Hills, Police Programs & Services
- Pate, Skogan, Wycoff & Sherman, Reducing the "Signs of Crime": The Newark Experience, Executive Summary (Police Foundation, report to the National Institute of Justice, 1985)
- Welsh & Farrington, "Effects of improved street lighting on crime," Campbell Systematic Reviews (2008)
- CrimeSolutions (U.S. Department of Justice), "License Plate Recognition Technology as a Crime Deterrent"
- Koper & Lum, "The effectiveness of license plate readers for patrol and investigations" (2018)